Publications /
Opinion

Back
Abandoning Afghanistan to the Taliban Wolves
Authors
June 26, 2020

Peace was near, most of the 5000 Taliban fighters were released—one condition for serious peace negotiations—and a city was selected for the negotiations between the Taliban and the Afghan government: Doha, Qatar. But an invisible enemy committed sabotage. COVID-19 brought down members of both sides. Worse: the Taliban’s supreme leader, Mullah Hibatullah Akhundzada was rumored to be on the threshold of death. NATO’s new senior civilian representative in Afghanistan, Stefano Pontecorvo, confirmed to Radio Free Afghanistan that COVID-19 was “impacting on all levels. It’s impacting on the levels of forces on both sides. It’s impacting the leadership” The new date of the Intra-Afghan talks will be announced as soon as the quarantined members of the negotiation teams reach Doha and test negative.

A look back at history. September, 11, 2001: the destruction of the twin towers of Manhattan, 19 hijackers, four passenger planes, 2977 victims. Physical damage and psychological trauma. A shocked America sent cruise missiles to Afghanistan and occupied the impoverished nation in Central Asia. The mainly Saudi Arabian hijackers who directed the planes into the twin towers were aligned to an Islamist terrorist organization known as al-Qaeda, led by Osama bin Laden, an estranged member of a wealthy Saudi family who was hiding in Afghanistan, protected by its fundamentalist rulers, the Taliban. Washington’s cruise missiles and war planes struck the country on October 7, 2001. American combat boots hit the ground on October 19. The war turned into a two trillion dollar nightmare.

Longest War in American History

More than 157,000 people have died in the battles of Afghanistan since 2001 (according to researchers for the Costs of War Project at Brown University). More than 43,000 civilians have died and by 2018 there were almost 2.5 million Afghan refugees worldwide, according to the United Nations refugee agency. American combat deaths have totaled 2,400 and another 20,000 U.S. soldiers have been wounded. More than 1,100 NATO troops have died, and about 45,000 Afghan troops and police officers were killed in just the last five years. Tens of thousands of Taliban fighters were sacrificed in these battles. In a secret operation by U.S. Special Forces, Osama bin Laden was surprised and shot in his hideout. But, according to the Council on Foreign Relations in March 2020, “the Taliban is stronger now than at any point in the last 18 years”. This is the longest war in the history of the United States, yet the battles last year were harsh and brutal. According to the New York Times article, In just the last quarter of 2019, the Taliban carried out 8,204 attacks, the highest over the last decade. The U.S. dropped 7,423 bombs and missiles during 2019, a record since the Air Force began recording data in 2006. But unknown to the public, despite the combat on the ground and from the air, drone attacks and suicide bombers, the enemies have been searching for a solution to end the war. U.S. allies had already ended their combat missions in 2014, restricting their activities to training of the local armed forces and the police. U.S. troops are still engaging the enemy, but mainly from the air, unable to uproot the mujahidin, which uses its knowledge of valleys and mountains, its tradition and tribes, the unspoken loyalty. As in South Vietnam in 1975, Afghanistan 2020 is facing a sober truth—the withdrawal of U.S. troops. During his Thanksgiving 2019 visit to American troops in Afghanistan, the U.S. President declared that he had reopened peace talks with the Taliban.

‘One Failed Strategy After Another’

Joseph Votel, former commander of U.S. Central Command, responsible for military operations in an area that spreads from Egypt to Pakistan and Yemen to Kazakhstan, including Afghanistan, applauded the decision of the President in an op-ed in the New York Times (December 13, 2019) as “A rare chance to end our longest war”. Votel, now retired and a senior fellow on national security at the Middle East Institute, recalled the “missed opportunities of ending the conflict on our terms”. In 2002 and 2017, “Al Qaeda was dispersed and the Taliban were shattered. A persistent political and diplomatic effort supported by steady military support could have put us on a different path. Instead, the intervening years brought one failed strategy after another, each for identifiable reasons: diverted attention, lack of military resources, loss of political will, arbitrary timelines, a resurgent and externally supported Taliban, fatigue in both the United States and Afghanistan, and severe internal problems within the Afghan government”. Despite the uneven progress on the ground, the special envoy Zalmay Khalilzad, the American chief negotiator, continued to press for peace.

After an American soldier was killed by terrorists in Afghanistan, Donald Trump cancelled a visit by a Taliban delegation to Camp David, the summer retreat of the president, and, officially, halted contacts with the Taliban. Mr Khalilzad though continued his shuttle diplomacy, in December joining the negotiations in Doha, Qatar, where the Taliban keep an office. After nine negotiation sessions in more than a year, the two sides reached an agreement, from which the official government in Kabul was excluded, although the United States promised it would release 5000 Taliban fighters (in exchange for 1000 government soldiers and officials) without prior consultation with their allies. Washington avoided recognizing the Taliban officially by asking chief negotiator Khalilzal to sign the agreement with the Taliban leader Baradar. Mike Pompeo, U.S. Secretary of State, was just a witness to the signature ceremony, not in a local palace, but a Doha hotel. The honorable Mullah made his intention clear: “I hope with the withdrawal of all foreign troops from Afghanistan, the Afghan nation under an Islamic regime will take its relief and embark on a new prosperous life”.

The United States will withdraw 3400 of its 12,000 soldiers within 135 days, and if the Taliban follows through on its commitments, all U.S. troops and other foreign forces will leave within 14 months. The Taliban guaranteed that their country would not be used by any of its members, either individuals, or terrorist groups, to threaten the security of the U.S. and its allies, promising to control Islamic State, or al Qaeda, which are both active on Afghan soil. The Taliban also guaranteed not to attack U.S. troops as they withdraw from their country. The Taliban are not to conduct suicide attacks against U.S. or allied troops, while the U.S. is to forgo drone strikes. The agreement contains nothing on women’s rights, elections or a new constitution, no renunciations of its desire for a government and justice system rooted in a severe interpretation of Islam. It is “a deeply flawed agreement”, according to Susan Rice, U.S. national security adviser from 2013 to 2017 and former ambassador to the United Nations. The agreement “has the potential to lead to peace but is very unlikely to achieve it”. In short: “The US gave a lot and got very little in return”. Given that intra-Afghan talks will take months (if they happen), if not years, to yield any progress, the United States is likely to withdraw before any deal is done, abandoning Afghanistan to the Taliban wolves.

The opinions expressed in this article belong to the author.

RELATED CONTENT

  • December 02, 2019
    Alain Antil, Chercheur et Directeur du Centre Afrique Subsaharienne de l’IFRI, analyse la dégradation de la sécurité au Sahel à travers une cartographie des zones touchées par le terroris ...
  • Authors
    November 1, 2019
    Dans la nuit du samedi 26, Donald Trump, comme à son habitude, lance un tweet quelque peu énigmatique :  ‘’Quelque chose d’énorme vient de se passer’’. Le porte-parole de la Maison Blanche renforce la devinette, en déclarant que le président ‘’fera, le dimanche 27 octobre à 9h, une annonce très importante’’, sans donner d’indices. Le suspens ne dura cependant que quelques minutes. Bien avant le rendez-vous fixé par Washington, des médias et des journalistes avancent l’éventuelle éli ...
  • Authors
    October 18, 2019
    The third edition of the African Peace and Security Annual Conference (APSACO) was held on June 18-19th 2019 under the theme “Africa's Place and Influence in a Changing World”. The two-day event, organized by Policy Center for the New South (PCNS), was launched with the publication of the Annual Report on Africa’s Geopolitics, Followed by five panels : - Panel 1: Africa and the world or How to balance Mutual perceptions; - Panel 2: Africa and the production of strategic and normati ...
  • Authors
    Lemine Ould M. Salem
    November 12, 2018
    C’est l’opération de maintien de la paix la plus meurtrière de l’histoire. Installée en juin 2013, la Mission multidimensionnelle intégrée des Nations unies pour la stabilisation au Mali (Minusma) a déjà perdu près de 200 personnes. L’application des dispositions de l’accord de paix signé en 2015 entre le gouvernement malien et les groupes rebelles du Nord marque un grand retard. Pendant ce temps, l’insécurité, longtemps contenue à la seule partie septentrionale du pays, se répand a ...
  • Authors
    Sabine Cessou
    September 24, 2018
    La conférence « A Brave New World, Adapting to a changing security landscape », organisée par Friends of Europe, le 20 septembre 2018 à Bruxelles, a consisté en des tables rondes auxquelles ont participé Bouchra Rahmouni Benhida, Senior Research Fellow d'OCP Policy Center et Amal El Ouassif, Research Assistant, notamment sur les plus grands défis de la politique extérieure européenne. « C’était très gratifiant de voir distribuées, aujourd’hui, les conclusions sur la migration d’un b ...
  • Authors
    Lemine Ould M. Salem
    July 5, 2018
    Cinq ans et demi après l’intervention militaire internationale conduite par la France pour chasser les jihadistes du nord du Mali, l’ancien Soudan français s’apprête à organiser une élection présidentielle censée accélérer le processus de paix issu des accords inter-maliens négociés à Alger et signés à Bamako en juin 2015. « Un scrutin décisif”, soutient en marge de l’African Peace and Security Annual Conference (APSACO), organisé les 18 et 19 juin 2018 à Rabat au Maroc par l’OCP P ...
  • Authors
    Sabine Cessou
    June 19, 2018
    The second edition of the African Peace and Security Annual Conference (APSACO), organized in Rabat by OCP Policy Center, has started on June 18th with a broad debate on the political and strategic aspects of peacekeeping operations in Africa. Their financial cost was discussed right from the start of the Conference, as well as the ongoing reform processes engaged by the United Nations in addition to the African Union. “This cost is somewhat exaggerated,” said Rachid El Houdaigui, ...
  • Authors
    الأمين ولد سالم
    June 13, 2018
    خلال القمة التي عقدها الرئيس الفرنسي إيمانويل ماكرون في قصر الإليزيه بباريس في 29 مايو 2018، صادق الفاعلون الرئيسيون الأربعة في الأزمة الليبية على "الإعلان السياسي بشأن ليبيا" الذي ينص على إجراء انتخابات برلمانية ورئاسية في 10 ديسمبر القادم. هذه الوثيقة "التاريخية"، كما جاء على لسان الرئيس الفرنسي، تظل مهددة بالتعقيدات التي تطبع الأوضاع على أرض الواقع في ليبيا. كثيرة هي المبادرات التي هدفت إلى إخراج ليبيا من الفوضى التي تتخبط فيها منذ انهيار نظام العقيد معمر القذافي في 2011. لكن حت ...
  • Authors
    Lemine Ould M. Salem
    June 6, 2018
    Les quatre acteurs majeurs de la crise libyenne ont approuvé, le 29 mai 2018, lors du Sommet organisé par le Président français Emmanuel Macron au Palais de l’Elysée à Paris, une “Déclaration politique sur la Libye” qui prévoit l’organisation le 10 décembre prochain d’un double scrutin, législatif et présidentiel. Ce texte “historique”, selon le Chef de l’Etat français, reste cependant menacé par la complexité de la réalité sur le terrain libyen. On ne compte plus les initiatives v ...
  • Authors
    December 20, 2017
    La troisième et dernière journée de la conférence de haut niveau Atlantique Dialogues, organisée du 13 au 15 décembre à Marrakech par l’OCP Policy Center, a porté pour l’essentiel sur des questions de géopolitique africaine, ainsi que sur la “croissance sans emploi”, “les partenariats Sud-Sud” et les témoignages apportés par trois anciens présidents d’Argentine et du Costa-Rica sur les trajectoires de développement latino-américaines. “Sécurité dans le Sahel et implications transat ...