Publications /
Opinion

Back
The old magic was no longer working - Part I
Authors
August 23, 2022

The rules he followed were his own. Made by Boris for Johnson. From his earliest days, Alexander Boris Johnson noted the BBC (July 7, 2022) “tended to believe rules were for other people.” When he worked as a journalist in Brussel’s decades ago, he unchained his phantasy and filed reports which were close to the truth but more often than not, just fake. “His route to No 10 Downing Street “, writes Jonathan Freedland in the “Guardian “(July 7, 2022), “was smoothed with lies.” Once, he was fired, working for the reputable London “Times”, for inventing a quote. A lie, simple as that. Or an insult: as published in 2007 in a column, describing the then US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as looking like a “sadistic nurse in a mental hospital.”   His patterns did not change in Downing Street 10, the official address of Britain‘s Prime minister, where he also lives, obliged to renovate and pay for his apartment. His third wife, Carrie, age 34, recently chose a fancy interior decorator, who proposed golden-colored wallpaper, which was not applauded by the public, battling with virus, inflation, and poverty. Since Boris, as the British named him while still popular, father of seven children, age 58, did not have the necessary funds, a donor of the Conservative Party advanced the financing of the decoration, as he allegedly did, at least partly, a few weeks ago, when Boris Johnson celebrated his wedding outside London on the sumptuous, 18th century  “Daylesford House” estate of Lord  Bamford, chairman of a construction equipment company. When Boris ordered a national lockdown, having people jailed or fined for not obeying his orders, one person was exempted -Boris Johnson. At least 16 gatherings, some drinking parties in Johnson’s offices or home in Downing Street, were documented ( PBS News Hour, July 7, 2022), while the coronavirus paralyzed Britain. The   Downing Street staff enjoyed their splendid isolation and drank excessively even the night before the Duke of Edinburgh's funeral, the Queen's husband. Johnson personally apologized to her majesty and assured the members of parliament repeatedly that he was unaware of the “Partygate”, as it became known- he was shocked” and “sickened” , just another lie, as it turned out, documented by videos and photographs- the leader of Britain was seen with a drink in his hand, not filled with orange juice, mind you. The prime minister also forgot that there was heavy drinking in Downing Street 10 at a Christmas party, which he attended, but erased from his mind.

The convict

 Eventually, the police began investigations; government members were fined, as Johnson’s possible successor, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rishi Sunak. (BBC, July 7, 2022) Johnson and his wife Carrie were also handed fines- from that moment on; newspaper columnists introduced Johnson as- ‘the convict,”. Deservedly perhaps. “Johnson had stood before the country in one of the darkest hours of the post-war era,” commented the ‘“Guardian” (July 7, 2022), the ghostly pandemic, which closed factories, airports, and pubs,  promised his nation “we are all in this together” that lockdown regulations “applied to everyone, including himself. But, as the nation discovered nearly two years later, that was not true.” He broke those rules; indeed, he broke the law. During those troubling days, Johnson decided to promote a close, Russian-born friend, whose father happened to be a former KGB agent (in London during the 1980s)turned oligarch, worth a couple of billions at one time, to the House of Lords. Alexander Lebedev publicly supported the invasion of Crimea, and his son, Evgeny, owner of a British media group (Evening Standard, Independent), pleaded with Moscow to” end the war and the killing of our Ukrainian brothers. MI 5 and MI6 warned the prime minister, who frequently was a guest at the Italian palazzo of his friend, often using the Russian’s private jet, that such a peerage would be a security risk since Saudi business, apparently located in the famous tax haven the Cayman Islands had invested in the media group. Alexander Lebedev’s connection to Putin was shady, at least unclear. Johnson could care less. He denied, for example, that in 2018, as Foreign minister, he had met Alexander Lebedev, a few days after a NATO summit dealing with Russia, secretly at his son’s estate, unaccompanied by close personal security, aka bodyguards, or Foreign office advisers, at a time when Russian agents had tried to poison a former espionage colleague in Britain. Johnson did not use the private jet that weekend but took an “Easy Jet” flight to Pisa to join the 17th-century villa near Perugia (Observer, November 17, 2019). When he returned to London, Johnson seemed overtired, his suit wrinkled, as so he had slept in the vineyard of his Russian friend, if ever there is a vineyard. In December  2020, Evgeny Lebedev took his seat in the House of Lords, forever known as “Baron Lebedev of Hampton and Siberia,” his friend Boris had vouched for him.TV editor Robert Peston described the Lebedev-Johnson friendship in his book “WTF ?”: “Some would argue it is unsettling  that Johnson, a mayor of London and then foreign secretary, thought it appropriate to take hospitality  from a Russian-born media mogul, whose oligarch father’s relationship with President Putin and the Kremlin is much debated and is certainly opaque.”

His gaffes and blunders became part of his brand

 A few days before the mutiny of Johnson’s senior ministers (including   Rishi Sunak), the abandoned prime minister admitted to a cross-party group of senior members of parliament his meeting with Lebedev at the palazzo near Perugia four years ago. As the “New York Times” said:” Johnson’s lies worked for years, until they didn’t” ( July 8, 2022). The truth, an unthinkable reality in other, less traditional, and proven democracies, is that “scandals that would have sunk other politicians” (Guardian, July 7, 2022) “appeared not to affect him. He was always able to bounce back. His gaffes and blunders became part of his brand. ” In an age of bland, machine-like politicians, suggests the “Guardian”, he was seen as a “character», his unruly mop of blond hair and bumbling “persona” instantly reproachable even for those with no interest in politics. His fun-loving, relentlessly upbeat image allied to formidable campaigning skills helped  reach parts of the electorate more conventional conservatives could not .” The “Guardian’s” Jonathan Freedland remembers that for years,” the conventional wisdom had held that “Boris” was the obvious choice for the jester, but an improbable king “.But after Theresa May won just 9 %  of the vote in the  2019 election for the European parliament, his critics  were “ready to overlook  all the obvious flaws and offer the throne to her polar opposite.” (Guardian)Johnson won two terms as mayor of London, normally a Labour stronghold, and helped convince millions to back Brexit. He became PM in July 2019 without an election but secured a historic landslide victory months later, winning seats in part of the country that had never voted conservatively. He won the general election with an 80-seat majority, the biggest win since 1987. “As 2020 dawned”, reported the BBC ( July 7, 2022), Johnson’s “dominance of British politics appeared to be complete.” His verbal volcano, polished as a student at Oxford University’s debating club, the famous Union, intimidated more than one parliamentarian in the House of Commons since he not only has a temper but was, as Ryan Heath said in “Politico” ( July 7, 2022)” a highly calculated politician. The messiness was by design. And so was the dramatic flair that sometimes led him to overstep.” He survived a confidence motion in June 2022, despite 41 percent of his MP’s voting against him. But some by-election losses of seats the Conservatives controlled for decades led MP‘s to fear, noted the BBC, “he had become an electoral liability. The old magic, it seemed, was no longer working. «In the end, it was not his handling of coronavirus that led to his downfall, but, as the BBC believes, “rather questions about his character and fitness to higher office.” Until September 5, Boris Johnson, a man “utterly unfit to be prime minister”, as his former newspaper boss, Sir Max Hastings, believes, will be housed at Downing Street 10 until early September. As soon as the Conservative Party had chosen its new leader, almost 200 000 members mailed in their decision during august, Foreign Office leader Liz Truss, the former Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rishi Sunak, and the Members of Parliament returned from their vacations; the new Prime minister will form his new cabinet. The Tory leadership race” is hotting up”, noted “Bloomberg”( July 23), the two remaining candidates “pulling out all the stops as they go for the top job in politics”- Tv debates, town hall meetings around the country,  on July 25 a BBC debate, a day later the “Sun” , a popular newspaper, will stage for its conservative audience, the Tory loyal, “The fight for No 10” . Liz Truss, 47, remained loyal to Johnson until the bitter end. She served in various Cabinet positions under David Cameron, Theresa May, and the removed PM, who appointed her to the Foreign Office job last year. Until July 5, 2022, Rishi Sunak, 42, a British-born Punjabi Hindu, was a loyal Johnson supporter, yet his resignation provoked the fall of the Prime minister. Sunak, Chancellor from 2020 onward, is married to the daughter of an Indian billionaire. The news that she avoided taxes in England on her considerable income may have hurt the reputation of her husband, who complained that his wife was smeared to get at him. “Johnson will be missed by many, who dislike traditional politicians, Ryan Heath writes in “Politico” (July 7, 2022); his insults were often hilarious when they did not tip over into racism. Who else would turn up for tea with the Queen looking like he just rolled out of bed?” Heath: “Johnson’s ejection from Downing Street is not a rejection of Brexit, or a sign that British conservatism is changing course. It is a rejection of a populist who became unpopular and often lacked a moral compass.”

RELATED CONTENT

  • May 31, 2018
    Avec la refonte des relations entre l’Union Européenne et les pays ACP (Afrique, Caraïbes et Pacifique), prévue pour février 2020, il devient urgent de repenser le cadre du partenariat entre l’Europe et l’Afrique et de proposer des éléments de refondation d’un vouloir vivre collectif. Priorité éducative, création d’emplois pour les jeunes via le développement territorial, promotion des partenariats publicprivé dans les infrastructures, comptent parmi les leviers d’actions possibles. ...
  • May 21, 2018
    Le partenariat Afrique Europe fait son chemin depuis l'adoption de la stratégie commune Afrique-UE et la négociation complexe des Accords de Partenariat Economiques. L’évaluation des volets commercial, financier et humain de ces relations multidimensionnelles fait ressortir la persistance de grands déséquilibres dans les échanges commerciaux de biens et services, des tensions dans la gestion de la mobilité humaine et des dysfonctionnements dans les mécanismes institutionnels de part ...
  • Authors
    May 16, 2018
    He has reserved his page in history. Half a century ago Ernest “Che” Guevara was an icon of a global youth rebellion, a revolutionary pop star for the dreaming romantic generation of  1968- kids of the bourgeois conformist society who never had the courage to risk their lives or time for the oppressed. Instead, the angry restless sympathizers of Cuban and Vietnamese fighters threw stones and molotov cocktails, some smoked pot and shouted their support to Ho Chi Minh, the frail leade ...
  • Authors
    Sabine Cessou
    April 16, 2018
    La conférence organisée par l'Institut Montaigne et l'OCP Policy Center à Paris le 12 avril a abordé la question de l'investissement étranger dans une Afrique perçue à la fois comme une menace et un nouvel eldorado en Europe. "L’Afrique et l’Europe sont dans une même voiture, à  l’avenir elles peuvent aller très haut et très vite ou se fracasser contre un mur", a affirmé Jean-Michel Huet, consutant pour Bearing Point. Son regret : que l'Afrique soit un sujet encore très peu perçu pa ...
  • March 23, 2018
    A un moment où l’Afrique renforce son attractivité, se dote de son propre récit et suscite l’intérêt de nouveaux partenaires, et où l’Europe traverse une crise économique et institutionnelle importante, quelles peuvent être les bases nouvelles du partenariat Union Européenne-Afrique ? Si le dernier sommet d’Abidjan, en novembre dernier, a mis l’accent sur la priorité éducative, l’appui au développement durable et inclusif, une coopération multi-secteurs, tout cela sur la base d’une ...
  • Authors
    March 15, 2018
    President Trump’s proclamation that, because of national security concerns, he will apply a 25% tariff on all steel and a 10% tariff on all aluminium imports into the United States – except provisionally and dependent on NAFTA negotiations those from Canada and Mexico – affects, respectively 5.1 billion Euros and 1.1 billion Euros of EU exports. These are not trivial sums. However, the invocation of the national security exception in this case has implications that go far beyond nar ...
  • Authors
    March 15, 2018
    « Revise, Reboot, Rebuild : Strategies for a time of Distrust »: that was this year’s theme for the Brussels Forum, a yearly high-level conference held from March 8th to 10th by the US think tank German Marshall Fund (GMF), partner of the OCP Policy Center who attended the event through its delegation. This meeting of some 400 policymakers, academics and private sector operators is reviewing the relationship between Europe and the United States. Brexit, the Trump administration, the ...
  • Authors
    Alice Ekman
    February 22, 2018
    The Chinese presence in the Mediterranean is raising new questions among the diplomatic services of the Maghreb countries, as well as those of southern Europe. Indeed, over the past five years, China has been translating its national priorities with increasing activism in the Mediterranean. This activism can be summarised into three main areas: creating China-Southern Europe sectoral cooperation forums, investments in transport, energy and telecommunications infrastructure, and cond ...