Publications /
Opinion

Back
The Global War of Subsidies
Authors
April 15, 2024

Prior to her visit to China on April 4—her second in nine months—Janet Yellen, United States Secretary of the Treasury, sent a message demanding that the country should not flood the world with cheap exports of clean energy. This would distort global markets and harm workers abroad, she said. According to a senior U.S. Treasury official, China’s excess industrial capacity and the government support that has fueled it were subject of discussion during her meeting with Chinese Premier Li Qiang.

Current levels of ample idle capacity and consumer restraint are some of the challenges China must address if it is to achieve higher economic growth. Exports, as in the past, may well be the sought-after means of addressing domestic demand insufficiency. Not surprisingly, everyone closely monitors the evolution of the Chinese exchange rate to see if there is any devaluation underway. As well as Yellen, officials from other major advanced economies occasionally refer to a potential flood of Chinese products.

Xi Jinping, meanwhile, has referred to clean energy and other high-tech sectors as the primary path forward for the country’s prosperity. As we discussed previously, China today is ahead of the United States and Europe in technological rivalry in clean energy. It is no wonder, then, that U.S. and European officials make frequent reference to Chinese exports and subsidies in this area.

The fact is that large-scale subsidies have proliferated in a race to subsidize so-called ‘strategic’ sectors. In response to China’s subsidies, the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and CHIPS and Science Act have put in place attractive subsidies for local production of clean-energy products and semiconductor equipment. Volkswagen called this a gold rush when announcing a decision to build an electric vehicle (EV) factory in South Carolina.

On the basis that it is supporting investments to combat climate change and reduce healthcare costs in the country, the U.S. IRA includes huge subsidies in the form of tax incentives, grants, and loan guarantees to bolster manufacturing in the U.S. While some of the subsidies, particularly those related to EV batteries, are available for investments in countries with which the U.S. has some free-trade agreement, their scope and value are lower than those available to companies committing to manufacture within the country.

Similarly, the CHIPS Act aims to subsidize a revival of the U.S. semiconductor industry. The US leads in the sector in terms of core technology and equipment, but mass production of advanced semiconductors occurs mostly abroad (Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, and - in the case of manufacturing equipment - ththe Netherlands). The law aims to reduce dependence on Taiwan in the event of a crisis in that country. Expenditures with the IRA alone, originally estimated at $385 billion, are expected to reach $1.2 trillion according to analysts.

The European Union (EU) has responded. The EU expressed almost immediate concern about the IRA, with protests focused on provisions that strengthen domestic production in the U.S. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called for the establishment of an EU Sovereignty Fund (ESF) to directly combat the effects of the IRA.

She stated that the EU needs to consider “how our so-called 'like-minded partners' are proceeding in the ongoing industrial and technological race”. The EU has had to ease rules that limit national government subsidies to industry. For the first time, national governments of EU member states can match subsidies offered outside the EU, if there is a risk of a project of ‘strategic importance’ being relocated elsewhere.

In addition to defending against the IRA, the EU is obviously concerned about China. Its automotive industry is eyeing the penetration of Chinese EVs, production of which, including in Hungary, has already been announced. Declarations of intent to establish trade restrictions in response to Chinese subsidies have been made.

South Korea and Japan have also implemented their own responses to subsidies from the outside. South Korea, after initially describing incentives for EVs and batteries manufactured in the U.S. as a “betrayal”, received updated guidance on the IRA from the U.S. Treasury that extended some tax incentives to them. Japan also obtained a similar agreement, qualifying its EV batteries and components for IRA incentives.

The major battery and semiconductor companies in both countries are planning new factories in the U.S. to ensure they continue to receive U.S. subsidies, as local content requirements under the IRA become more stringent over time. However, both the South Koreans and Japanese have acknowledged that U.S. subsidies also pose a threat to their own domestic industries. Both pursue a dual strategy covering incentives available under the IRA, while implementing their own national subsidy policies to protect key sectors.

Even Australia, which has a free-trade agreement with the U.S. and little industry to protect, has decided to enact a subsidy program seeking to bolster activity in areas such as batteries and critical mineral processing, which are considered strategically significant.

Judging by announcements and initial investments, the effect of incentives on U.S. supply chains has been intense. Mexico—partnered with the U.S. via the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, and therefore a beneficiary of the IRA—replaced China as the largest exporter to the U.S. last year, marking the first time since 2006 that China has not been the largest. There is a realignment of global trade underway.

Any economic evaluation of costs and benefits of these subsidy programs faces an inner difficulty in considering that the sought-after results are not strictly optimal economically. There is a risk that countries, especially the U.S. and China, will adopt increasingly broad definitions of what constitutes a strategic sector, triggering new ‘global subsidy wars’. For countries with no fiscal space to, if they wish, compete in cutting-edge strategic sectors this is bad news.

 

RELATED CONTENT

  • Authors
    April 26, 2023
    It is estimated that $1 trillion to $6 trillion per year (up to 2050) needs to be invested globally if the world is to stay below the 2°C global warming ceiling of the Paris Agreement and to meet its adaptation goals. Currently, investments stand at about $630 billion per year, way below the original target. And although great efforts have been made in the climate-finance area, more than 70% of the funds deployed have gone to one sector, renewable energy, followed by the transportat ...
  • April 10, 2023
    This policy paper examines India’s growing engagement in North Africa, focusing on five countries: Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, and Egypt. Despite lacking a distinct regional policy for North Africa, India has amplified its bilateral engagement with these countries, underpinned by a steadfast commitment to the principle of South-South cooperation. Through its strategic moves in North Africa, India has established a powerful southern-west axis for its foreign policy that stretch ...
  • Authors
    April 10, 2023
    The contemporary global energy landscape is experiencing noteworthy changes in demand, supply, technology, markets, and investment. These developments transcend conventional oil and gas security considerations. Renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar power, have become increasingly cost-effective compared to fossil fuels, and the minerals required to produce them are gaining importance. Nevertheless, recent events such as the Covid-19 pandemic and the conflict in Ukraine ha ...
  • Authors
    Hala Boumaiz
    April 7, 2023
    In an attempt to bring the World Cup back to Europe and Africa, Morocco has joined Spain and Portugal in a three-way bid to host the 2030 FIFA World Cup. While there are still talks of Ukraine remaining in the bid, the three confirmed countries are hoping to score big with major economic, cultural, and political benefits. Although not as large as the Olympics in terms of logistics, the FIFA World Cup is one of the most prestigious and watched sporting events in the world. Early figu ...
  • April 7, 2023
    Le Policy Center for the New South, la Faculté de Gouvernance, des Sciences Économiques et Sociales (FGSES), l’Association Démocratique des Femmes du Maroc et le Réseau Marocain des Femmes Médiatrices organisent conjointement une série d’activités pour commémorer la Journée internationa...
  • Authors
    April 5, 2023
    The Policy Center for the New South and the Economic Research Forum held on March 20 a workshop titled ‘Stabilization and adjustment towards inclusive and sustainable policies in MENA: The Moroccan case study’. The event took place at the PCNS headquarters in Rabat, Morocco. It brought together renowned Moroccan economists and scholars to discuss the issue of public debt sustainability in the context of the Moroccan economy. It was an occasion to revisit the main features of the Mor ...
  • Authors
    April 4, 2023
    In 2010, when I was one of the vice presidents at the World Bank, colleagues I and published a very upbeat book  about the possibility of emerging and developing economies replacing advanced countries as engines of global economic growth. While the latter would be grappling with the aftermath of the global financial crisis, the former, already growing at a faster pace in the previous decade and accounting for more than half of the annual increases in global GDP, had largely shown an ...
  • April 4, 2023
    Face à l’essor des cryptomonnaies, les banques centrales sont en train de réagir en lançant leurs propres monnaies numériques. L’objet de ce Policy Brief est de faire le point sur la préparation des monnaies numériques de banques centrales (MNBC) par les autorités monétaires, un processus qui concerne tous les pays, émergents, en développement, et plus avancés. Il s’agit aussi d’analyser les conditions et certaines des conséquences (pour les banques, pour l’inclusion fin ...
  • April 4, 2023
    Faced with the rise of cryptocurrencies, central banks are responding by launching their digital currencies. The purpose of this Policy Brief is to provide an update on the preparation of central bank digital currencies (CBDs) by monetary authorities, a process that concerns all emerging, developing, and more advanced countries. It is also about analyzing the conditions and some of the consequences (for banks, for financial inclusion, for the conduct of monetary policy...) of such a ...