Publications /
Opinion

Back
The American People, Not Vladimir Putin Should Decide Who is President of the United States
Authors
September 28, 2020

Bank robbers are now and then caught because banks, insurance companies, or robbed personalities promise rewards for the arrest of criminals. In the past, Hollywood took the lead in dreaming up such scenarios. But in early August, the U.S. State Department offered a $10 million reward for information leading “to the identification or location of any person, who works with or for a foreign government for the purpose of interfering with U.S. elections through certain illegal cyber activities”.

Washington’s intelligence services are certain that foreign forces, presumably located in St. Petersburg, Tehran, Beijing, or Pyongyang, are once again preparing mischief in the electoral process. The troll armies and Putin bots are ready to confuse American society even further, disseminating disinformation and propaganda via Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and spreading fake news, rumors, exaggerations, and inventions. “Putin is presumably deciding now how far to go in interfering in the 2020 election”, declared David Shimer, U.S. historian and author of Rigged: America, Russia and One Hundred Years of Covert Electoral Interference, a study of Russian and American efforts to influence elections around the world.

As November draws near, “foreign interference is already present in this year’s elections,” according to The Verge (August 5). U.S. tech giant Microsoft informed the campaign of Joe Biden, according to Foreign Policy (September 11) that it “may have been the target of a suspected hacking attempt by Russian backed state actors, demonstrating Moscow’s continued efforts to interfere in and influence U.S. elections. Hackers reportedly targeted staffers of the prominent campaign strategy and communications firm SKDKnickerbocker, which has worked on the campaign of several past Presidential candidates and is currently taking a lead role in supporting Biden’s run. Sources told the news agency “Reuters” that they had been trying to break into the firm’s networks for the past two months, but they appear to have failed to breach SKDK’s security… The U.S. Treasury Department also sanctioned four people accused of trying to interfere in the elections on behalf of Russia. One is a member of the Ukrainian parliament, while the other three are Russian nationals employed by Russia’s Internet Research Agency, which was heavily involved in Moscow’s influence campaign during the 2016 Presidential elections”.

‘Terrifying Foreign Threat’

In late July, William Evanina, director of the U.S. National Counterintelligence and Security Center, told members of Congress that Moscow was working, as in 2016, to boost the campaign of Donald Trump and undermine that of Joe Biden, the Democrats’ Presidential candidate: “We assess that Russia is using a range of measures to primarily denigrate former Vice President Biden and what it sees as an anti-Russian establishment”. Mr. Evanina confirmed that Russia is using social media and many other tools to inflame social divisions, promote conspiracy theories, and to sow distrust. Classified briefings on the foreign meddling, stated Richard Blumenthal, U.S. Senator from Connecticut, “have been absolutely chilling, and frankly, terrifying in the magnitude of foreign threat to our election security that we face. It really is a break-the-glass moment”. Majority leader Mitch McConnell confirmed the “significant threat” posed by Moscow, but considered it “a serious mistake” to ignore China and Iran.

President Trump himself may be the only person still unconvinced. In his memoir, The Room Where it Happened, Trump’s former National Security Advisor, John Bolton, stated: “Trump remained, as he had been from the beginning, unwilling or unable to admit any Russian meddling because he believed doing so would undercut the legitimacy of his election and the narrative of the ‘witch hunt’ against him”.  Historian David Shimer warned that “leaders like Putin push as far as they can without provoking meaningful pushback and in that sense, Trump’s continued passivity towards Russia could embolden Putin to proceed more aggressively”. Unless someone brave or desperate in St. Petersburg or Beijing is tempted by the bounty of $10 million, the 2020 U.S. Presidential election could see manipulation and a historical meltdown, suggesting a failing democracy.

The opinions expressed in this article belong to the author.

RELATED CONTENT

  • Authors
    Imane Lahrich
    November 5, 2024
    This brief presents an analysis of key trends and observations from the 2024 U.S. presidential election, in which I participated through the American Council of Young Political Leaders (ACYPL) Election Exchange Program, organized in collaboration with the U.S. Department of State. The program offered a comprehensive exploration of contemporary U.S. electoral dynamics, focusing on party strategies, demographic shifts, media influence, and campaign finance. The insights presented here ...
  • October 30, 2024
    The global impact of the US elections on Africa is significant, with each administration shaping US-Africa relations through trade policies, development aid, and security cooperation. Potential shifts in economic and political alliances underscore Africa's strategic role amid US-China t...
  • Authors
    Fernanda Magnotta
    October 30, 2024
    Beyond partisan rhetoric, November's election in the United States can determine America's approach to a rapidly shifting world order. Donald Trump's first term, from 2016 to 2020, marked a historic departure from the post-Second World War bipartisan consensus. His ‘America First’ approach introduced a transactional view of international relations that continues to shape the current political landscape. This approach was seen in actions such as Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Clim ...
  • October 15, 2024
    يخصص مركز السياسات من أجل الجنوب الجديد هذه الحلقة من برنامجه الأسبوعي "حديث الثلاثاء" لمناقشة الانتخابات الرئاسية الأمريكية لعام 2024 وتداعياتها على العلاقات الأمريكية الإفريقية. مع اقتراب موعد الانتخابات الرئاسية الأمريكية 2024، يترقب العالم بأسره نتائج هذا السباق المحتدم بين المرشحي...
  • October 7, 2024
    The Policy Center for the New South organized a roundtable on September 30th, focusing on the dynamics of the upcoming US Elections. This event featured a presentation by David Sylvan, Affiliate Professor at Mohammed VI Polytechnic University and an expert in US foreign policy and polit...
  • October 3, 2024
    This episode explores the potential effects of the 2024 U.S. elections on Africa, focusing on U.S. foreign policy, economic relations, and security cooperation. It examines key issues like shifts in U.S. strategies towards Africa, particularly in response to growing Chinese and Russian ...
  • Authors
    September 27, 2024
    This paper examines the implications of the U.S.-China trade war for developing countries, particularly in light of the 2024 U.S. presidential election. The study traces the origins and escalation of the trade conflict, analyzing its multiple impacts on global trade patterns and economic growth. While some developing countries have benefited from trade diversion and supply-chain shifts, others, especially resource-exporting nations and the least-developed countries, have faced signi ...
  • Authors
    Kassie Freeman
    September 23, 2024
    The 2024 Presidential election in the United States will be historic and consequential. Both candidates are history-making in different ways. Democratic nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris, is the first woman of African and Asian descent to become the Democratic Party’s nominee, while President Trump won his party’s nomination without participating in any Republic Primary debates. Even more strikingly different are their parties’ platforms—what they would do if elected. However, i ...
  • September 5, 2024
    Les élections présidentielles américaines de 2024 se déroulent dans un contexte de polarisation politique marquée, qui reflète les divisions idéologiques et sociales au sein de la société américaine. Ce phénomène résulte de diverses dynamiques structurelles, telles que le ‘’gerrymandering’’, l'évolution des médias, l'essor des réseaux sociaux, et un système de financement des campagnes électorales dominé par de grands donateurs. Ces facteurs ont contribué à redéfinir le paysage poli ...