Publications /
Opinion

Back
​​​​​​​The United Nations and Social Justice: A Noble Mission, A Flawed System
Authors
February 20, 2025

The United Nations was built on a promise: to create a world in which justice, equality, and human dignity prevail. Arising from the ashes of the Second World War, the UN’s charter is filled with lofty ideals—social progress, human rights, and “better standards of life in larger freedom.” Decades later, the rhetoric remains intact, but the reality tells a different story.

The UN has played a critical role in shaping global conversations around poverty, human rights, and inequality, but the question remains: is it truly delivering on social justice, or has it morphed into a bureaucratic machine that manages rather than challenges global inequities?

An Institution Built to Persuade, Not Enforce

The UN is, in many ways, the world’s conscience. It is a single platform that brings governments, civil society, and international institutions together, crafting global norms on everything from labor protections to human rights. Over the years, it has been the architect of sweeping declarations—the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), and most recently, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

But declarations do not create justice. The UN lacks enforcement power. It can investigate, document, and denounce abuses, but it cannot force compliance. Governments sign human-rights treaties while continuing to suppress dissent. They pledge to tackle inequality while entrenching policies that widen the gap between rich and poor. Ultimately, the UN’s influence depends on voluntary commitments from its member states—commitments that, too often, go unfulfilled.

The SDGs: Grand Ambitions, Limited Power

The Sustainable Development Goals, adopted in 2015, were meant to be a blueprint for a fairer world. Seventeen targets—from ending hunger to reducing inequality—mapped out an ambitious global agenda.

Yet, as the 2030 deadline for achievement of the SDGs approaches, progress is alarmingly slow. The COVID-19 pandemic, economic shocks, and geopolitical instability have derailed many goals. But the deeper issue is structural. The UN lacks the financial and political muscle to drive real change. It does not control development funding; it relies on donors, whose priorities shift with political cycles. The financing gap for achieving the SDGs stands at a staggering $4 trillion a year, with little sign of being filled.

More fundamentally, the SDGs are based on a flawed assumption: that governments and the private sector will prioritize social justice if given the right framework. But, in a world in which wealth is increasingly concentrated and corporate power is unchecked, voluntary pledges are not enough.

Selective Justice and Political Blind Spots

Nowhere is the UN’s credibility more tested than in the realm of human rights. The UN Human Rights Council investigates violations, issues reports, and offers technical assistance to states. The UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) provides protection for millions of displaced people. The International Labour Organization (ILO) sets standards for workers’ rights.

Yet, justice at the UN is often selective. The Human Rights Council includes countries with appalling human rights records. Major powers escape serious scrutiny, while smaller or geopolitically weaker nations bear the brunt of condemnation. The UN’s handling of conflicts—from Gaza to Ukraine to Myanmar—has been riddled with double standards, damaging its credibility as a neutral arbiter of justice.

Even in areas in which the UN has made strides—gender equality, access to education, health—progress is often uneven. It is easier to champion causes that do not challenge entrenched power structures. But when justice requires corporate tax avoidance to be confronted, monopolies to be broken up, or reparations for historical injustices to be demanded, the UN is conspicuously silent.

A Global System Rigged Against Change

The UN’s limitations are not just about political will—they are built into the structure of global governance itself. Power at the UN is distributed unevenly, mirroring the economic and political hierarchies of the world order.

The Security Council, dominated by five permanent members with veto power, remains a relic of the post-Second World War balance of power. Reforming it is a near-impossible task, blocked by those that benefit most from the status quo.

Economic justice is another glaring gap. While the General Assembly passes resolutions calling for debt relief, fairer trade policies, and more equitable development finance, real power lies elsewhere. The International Monetary Fund, World Bank, and World Trade Organization—institutions that shape the economic realities for billions of people—operate under governance structures in which wealthier nations hold disproportionate sway.

The result is a system that administers global inequality rather than dismantling it.

Can the UN Still Be a Force for Social Justice?

For all its shortcomings, the UN remains the only institution with a truly global social mandate. It has the capacity to set norms, mobilize resources, and amplify the voices of marginalized communities. The alternative—no UN at all—would likely mean an even more fragmented and unequal world.

But if it is to be more than a caretaker of the status quo, the UN must push for deeper structural reforms:

- Challenge global financial injustice: Advocate not just for aid, but for systemic changes—debt restructuring, fair taxation, and an end to illicit capital flows.

- Hold all states accountable: End the practice of selective human-rights enforcement. Justice cannot be contingent on political alliances.

- Reform global governance: Shift power in decision-making bodies to reflect the realities of a multipolar world, rather than maintaining a system built in 1945.

- Move beyond voluntary commitments: Develop enforcement mechanisms that ensure social justice goals are more than aspirations.

The Limits of Idealism in a Power-Driven World

Social justice, from a realist perspective, is not achieved through moral appeals or institutional resolutions but through power dynamics. Without the ability to compel compliance, the UN remains an instrument through which states and corporations negotiate their interests, rather than a true arbiter of global justice.

The UN’s greatest challenge is not its lack of ambition but the constraints imposed by the very system it operates within. It can convene summits, issue reports, and raise awareness, but unless it can challenge power—both political and economic—it risks remaining a well-meaning custodian of the status quo.

The world does not need a UN that merely manages inequality. It needs one that is empowered to reshape it. But in the current international order, such a transformation remains a distant prospect.

RELATED CONTENT

  • December 16, 2020
    The COVID-19 pandemic has hit the Moroccan economy hard, as elsewhere in the world. A collapse in external demand and a lockdown lasting more than three months have profoundly altered economic activity in Morocco, causing its first recession since 1995. The implementation of the confinement and social distancing measures was strict and came two weeks after the detection of the first cases of COVID-19 in Morocco on March 2, 2020. The lockdown was extended three times and lasted aroun ...
  • Authors
    Yahya Drissi-Daoudi
    December 16, 2020
    During the last few weeks, the United States has seen unfold one of its most contentious elections to date, which also registered a record turnout. While the results trickled in after November 3, each camp reassured its base regarding its confidence in a win, President Trump going as far as calling the election in his favor on Twitter. The following weekend, news outlets began calling the Presidency in favor of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden, who served under President Obama ...
  • December 15, 2020
    يستضيف مركز السياسات من أجل الجنوب الجديد في حلقة جديدة من برنامجه الأسبوعي حديث الثلاثاء ثلة من الفاعلين المدنيين والباحثين في السياسات العمومية والشأن العام لمناقشة دور المجتمع المدني بمختلف مكوناته سواء على المستوى الوطني أو المحلي كما ينص عليها الدستور المغربي، حيث سيتطرق ضيوفنا إلى...
  • Authors
    Fernando S. Perobelli
    Inácio F. Araújo
    Karina S. S. Bugarin
    December 14, 2020
    This paper explores the use of simulations in policy decision-making in the Brazilian State of São Paulo in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic. We propose a methodology for assessing the daily economic costs of control strategies for mitigating the effects of coronavirus. The method is based on the partial hypothetical extraction approach to input–output systems. Simulated daily scenarios based on different levels of compliance to the control measures are used to help guide the design o ...
  • Authors
    December 14, 2020
    L’économie marocaine fait face à une année 2020 extrêmement difficile et complexe. La crise provoquée par le choc de la Covid-19 est singulière, multicanale et fondamentalement différente des crises précédentes. Elle altère le système productif par un double choc d’offre et de demande, amplifié, de passage, par une crise de confiance. Alors que l’année 2020 touche à sa fin, il est crucial de dresser une première évaluation circonstanciée des ramifications de cette crise, qui permett ...
  • December 10, 2020
    The purposeful dissemination of misleading or outright false information by news media and foreign state actors constitutes an increasingly important factor in both the growing erosion of trust in national institutions and political polarization in many countries around the world. The d...
  • Authors
    Hanae Bezad
    Maximo Plo Seco
    Roger Hilton
    December 10, 2020
    The Atlantic basin faces considerable challenges on multiple fronts. Financial and economic struggles, coupled with political shifts and social turmoil, are reshaping the region’s geopolitical landscape. Unemployment, poverty, violence, migration, extremism, climate change and other problems are on the rise and the need to tackle them effectively is pressing. To find adequate solutions to these challenges, it is crucial to create inclusive discussions between the North and the Sout ...
  • Authors
    December 9, 2020
    Poker is a game for real men, cowboys, for example, ocean divers, stunt men, gambling away their meager pay. Poker is America, as oversized as its trucks, egos and steaks. Poker made its way from quaint southern New Orleans to the rough west, where gold diggers gambled away fortunes, and settlers risked their wagons and horses for a game of cards. Decades ago I met Johnny Moss, a descendent of this wild bunch in Las Vegas. He is the greatest poker player of our time, as his biograph ...
  • December 8, 2020
    اكتسبت حملة الستة عشر يوماً العالمية لمناهضة العنف القائم على النوع الاجتماعي والتي أطلقها مركز القيادة العالمية للمرأة في معهده العالمي الأول للقيادة النسائية في عام 1991 قوة جذب في أكثر من 187 دولة بمشاركة أكثر من 6,000 منظمة. إذ أن العنف القائم على النوع الاجتماعي من المشاكل الواسعة ...