Publications /
Opinion

Back
The Tribe of Davos Globalists Feels the Downturn of Globalization
Authors
January 23, 2024

The annual World Economic Forum took place in Davos, Switzerland, from January 15-19. Every year for 54 years, a global business elite has traveled there, whether to interact with customers and suppliers, with intellectual leaders on broad topics or, in an informal environment, with the representatives of governments and multilateral authorities who attend.

Nothing is deliberated, of course, but over time the forum has established a reputation as a stage from which announcements are made and better cross-knowledge of the opinions of key people on hot topics can be obtained.

I personally had the opportunity to see this at the forum in January 2003, when I was a member of the Brazilian government delegation. At that moment, there was enormous and widespread interest in knowing what the first Lula government would be like. Rarely in my life have I seen such a large group of world-renowned economists sitting in a room to listen to the then-newly appointed Minister of Finance, Antônio Palocci, and President of the Central Bank, Henrique Meirelles, talk about their policy plans. Lula also received a huge spotlight at the event. The forum clearly served to satisfy this type of curiosity.

Xi Jinping, president of China, for example, knew how to use Davos well to defend globalization and free trade in 2017. China managed to climb the per-capita income ladder by taking advantage of globalization and, at that moment, it began to have to deal with the anti-Chinese attitude taken by the then Trump Administration. There could not be a better stage for delivering his message.

This year the official motto was ‘rebuilding trust’. It is no coincidence that geopolitical risks dominated discussions, from the wars in Gaza and Ukraine, to the possible consequences of Trump’s return to the White House after this year’s American elections. This was despite some kind of optimism that could have been generated by the favorable surprises in the global economy in 2023, after the predictions made at last year’s forum, when the dominant view—later contradicted—was that the global economy would go through strong deceleration. The need for more ‘trust’ and cooperation to mitigate global risks was the motto.

In January 2003, there was also the shadow of geopolitics. The possibility of an invasion of Iraq—which happened two months after the event—was the subject of discussions. The memory of September 11, 2001, was also fresh enough to appear in discussions. But the fact is that the predominance of the economic globalization agenda was then crystal clear.

Not this year. The 2024 Global Risks Report proposed by the Forum highlighted 10 main risks for the next 10 years. Five of these refer to environmental issues:

1- Extreme weather events;

2- Critical change in Earth systems;

3- Loss of biodiversity and ecosystem collapse;

4- Scarcity of natural resources; and

5- Pollution.

 

The report remarks that such environmental risks can exceed points of no return (‘tipping points’). In addition, the report highlights growing political polarization, technological risks with artificial intelligence evolving beyond the reach of regulatory controls, and new security risks accompanying the rise in geopolitical tensions. These themes predominated, at least judging by the open online sessions that I attended.

The Davos Forum is a giant in-person networking opportunity. The ebb during the pandemic hasn’t changed that. But something seems to have changed regarding what political scientist Samuel Huntington described in 2004 as a tribe, a global elite with “little need for national loyalty, [...] seeing national borders as obstacles that are fortunately disappearing and national governments as residues of the past. In other words, he described men – and – women of Davos as a tribe of “globalists”.

The Davos Forum is so identified with the expansion and strengthening of globalization in the decades in which it flourished, that it could not emerge unscathed from globalization’s partial retrenchment in recent times. Fears about deglobalization must have been predominant.

It is still paradoxical that, in addition to the smaller presence of globally significant public authorities compared to previous forums, the event had a speech by the new president of Argentina, Javier Milei, in which he warned the men and women of Davos about the risks of being captured by a worldview that “leads to socialism and, consequently, poverty”. Milei sounded how many far-right people have characterized … the ‘globalists’, like the people who attend the World Economic Forum at Davos. It must have been odd for Davos globalists to receive such a message.

RELATED CONTENT

  • Authors
    Nisrine Ouazzani
    January 6, 2016
    The economic growth of the African continent and its positioning as an emerging force is a reality no longer questioned. Optimism surrounding the Africa rising narrative is supported by a growing young workforce, an expanding middle class, new discoveries of natural resources and minerals, relative political stability and infrastructure developments. Economic and international financial actors now recognize the potential that the continent represents for the world economy, consider ...
  • Authors
    December 23, 2015
    Global economic growth is likely to be a little better in 2016 than this year’s lackluster outcome. The ongoing slow recovery in the United States and Europe is likely to continue. However, weakness in China as well as several large emerging markets, and sluggishness of world trade, mean that risks are weighted on the downside of this forecast. Morocco, which is reliant on European markets, is a heavy importer of oil, and whose currency has devalued in effective terms, should find t ...
  • Authors
    December 14, 2015
    The end of supply chain is the natural corollary of the sustained price fall of virtually all commodities observed over the past many months. If it appears premature to state exactly what is the impact of this deconsolidation in the commodities value chain, it is believed that the strategic role of physical trading is strengthening. Under such circumstances, the industrial strategies of developing countries and commodity exporters may have to evolve and, in priority, foster optimizi ...
  • Authors
    December 8, 2015
    Trade negotiators rarely get to celebrate a victory. The United States, for example, has been negotiating over 15 bilateral free trade agreements, with none concluded since the Korea-US agreement was finalized at the end of 2010. This makes the recently finalized Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)agreement between the United States and 11 other countries all the more remarkable. But the TPP still faces major hurdles, not least a divisive ratification debate in the U.S. Congress, which ...
  • December 7, 2015
    The Euro-Mediterranean Partnership was initiated with the aim to build a space of shared prosperity and security among all the countries in the region. The achievement of this objective, however, continues to be challenged by several geopolitical, economic and social factors. In such a context, there is now a greater urgency to adapt the approach and the instruments, thus allowing Euro-Mediterranean partners to seize opportunities towards an effective area of shared stability and pr ...
  • Authors
    November 25, 2015
    The contribution that the diaspora makes to development in the country of origin is examined. Drawing on a recent World Bank survey of migrants from the MENA countries, the needs of the diaspora and the development role it can play through its organizations are reviewed. A constructive interaction with the diaspora can be greatly enhanced by supportive policies in the country of origin. The main focus of the paper is on the Middle East and North African region, and more specifically ...
  • Authors
    Karim El Mokri
    Aziz Ragbi
    Said Tounsi
    November 23, 2015
    The issue of a powerful fiscal policy comeback is not only being debated in Europe. It is also interesting for Morocco, in many respects. If in Europe there is controversy between the proponents of the structural budgetary balance rule and critics of restrictive policies in the context of major financial and recessive shocks, in the South of the Mediterranean fiscal policy is caught between the multiple social and economic requirements and the constraint of sustainability. ...