Publications /
Policy Brief

Back
Mitigating the Adjustment Costs of International Trade
Authors
Sait Akman
Clara Brandi
Peter Draper
Andreas Freytag
Miriam Kautz
Peter Rashish
Johannes Schwarzer
Rob Vos
June 25, 2018

The evidence demonstrating that nations gain from trade is overwhelming. However, trade liberalization can cause disruption to firms and workers, and its gains and losses are spread unevenly. While many gain from trade, import surges have sometimes undermined the economic viability of whole communities. Existing mechanisms specifically designed to mitigate trade adjustment costs are often inadequate. They can be a source of inefficiency and inequity since trade shocks are only a part of the economic uncertainty affecting workers. Gradualism in trade liberalization combined with preemptive measures to strengthen competitiveness, can help mitigate adjustment costs. Displaced workers are best helped using generally applied safety nets, not those specific to trade. But these are not enough. Trade adjustment requires mobility of factors. International coordination is required to support an open and predictable trading system under the WTO, as the greatest future source of trade shocks could be protectionism, not trade liberalization.

RELATED CONTENT

  • Authors
    October 28, 2015
    OCP Policy Center and the German Marshall Fund are pleased to present this second edition of Atlantic Currents, an annual report charting wider Atlantic patterns and perspectives. The report is the result of a close collaboration between The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF) and OCP Policy Center, and is a companion to the Atlantic Dialogues, our annual forum in Morocco. Both activities are part of a multi-year partnership to promote dialogue and analysis on issues aff ...
  • Authors
    October 27, 2015
    International trade has become a pervasive feature of our lives, yet it remains controversial and resisted across the world. High and rising income inequality, which is often blamed on international trade, especially trade with China, is one reason. But the main driver of inequality is new technology, not international trade. Although trade interacts with new technology in ways that often lead to higher inequality, trade and technology also lie at the root of economic advance. So th ...
  • Authors
    John Seaman
    October 20, 2015
    Le présent article examine les efforts déployés par la Chine pour s’assurer l’accès à des ressources naturelles provenant de l’étranger en quantités toujours plus importantes. Dans sa quête de ressources nécessaires pour alimenter son économie, la Chine cherche-t-elle à encourager le développement des marchés internationaux ou plutôt à s’approvisionner en ressources de façon plus mercantiliste ? L’attitude variable de la Chine sur un large éventail de marchés des ressources suggère ...
  • Authors
    Lilia Rizk
    October 19, 2015
    OCP Policy Center holds in its arsenal a wide array of different resources aimed at creating a knowledge sharing platform that constructively dissects key economic, international relations and strategic issues. To achieve this objective, research initiatives, training programs and sessions, as well as conferences and seminars are put in place, thus offering an appropriate open debate platform to stimulate new analytical approaches.  Within this range of activities, OCP Policy Cente ...
  • Authors
    Marie-Claire Aoun
    October 14, 2015
    Plusieurs facteurs bien connus sont à l’origine de l’effondrement des cours du brut depuis juin 2014. Face à une offre pétrolière excédentaire avec l’essor des pétroles de schiste américains, le ralentissement de la croissance économique des pays émergents, notamment des pays à forte intensité énergétique comme le Brésil, la Chine ou la Russie se traduit par une consommation pétrolière mondiale, toujours en croissance, mais à un rythme moindre que les années précédentes. A ces évolu ...
  • Authors
    October 2, 2015
    Récemment parue parmi la série de Policy Briefs publiés par OCP Policy Center, une étude réalisée conjointement par Prakash Loungani et Saurabh Mishra a mis l’accent sur la réaction du chômage et l’emploi par rapport à la croissance économique dans les pays du G-20. L’objectif est de quantifier l’apport d’un point supplémentaire de croissance sur l’évolution du taux d’emploi, et sur le taux du chômage sur la période 1980-2014.  Sur la période 1980-2007, les résultats indiquent que ...