Publications /
Opinion

Back
Exploring Article 6: The Key to Building a Global Carbon Market
Authors
November 14, 2024

At the COP29 climate summit that began on November 11, 2024, in Baku, Azerbaijan, one of the main focuses is Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. Article 6, introduced at COP21 in 2015 and shaped through years of negotiation, enables countries to meet climate targets collaboratively, either through carbon markets or non-market strategies. This section of the Paris Agreement has the potential to unlock significant climate finance, cut the cost of reducing emissions, and foster cooperation on climate goals. But the pathway remains complex. COP29 is expected to be critical for advancing the mechanics and addressing unresolved issues.

Breaking Down Article 6 Mechanisms

Article 6 offers three main pathways for countries to collaborate:

1- Article 6.2Bilateral Carbon Trading: This provision allows countries to trade “internationally transferred mitigation outcomes” (ITMOs), integrating these trades into their own national climate goals, or nationally determined contributions (NDCs). This flexible, country-to-country approach empowers countries to set and follow their own standards. But without a central regulatory body, ensuring consistency in carbon credits remains a challenge.

2- Article 6.4UN-Managed Global Carbon Market: Often likened to an enhanced Clean Development Mechanism, Article 6.4 provides a structured United Nations framework to issue, validate, and trade high-quality carbon credits internationally. Though it promises a centralized system with high levels of integrity and transparency, it also imposes stricter regulations and fees, potentially slowing adoption, especially in developing nations.

3- Article 6.8Non-Market Cooperation: This provision enables policy cooperation and technology transfers, providing an alternative for countries to achieve climate goals without direct trading. Though less defined, it offers a platform to share non-market mitigation projects and attract support.

Together, these three mechanisms aim to create a balanced framework for climate collaboration, with each approach tailored to different types of cooperative action.

Pros and Cons: Article 6.2 vs. Article 6.4

The bilateral flexibility of Article 6.2 offers adaptability but also brings challenges. Countries can set their own carbon-credit standards, making participation simpler; however, without central oversight, the risk of inconsistency and variable credit quality is high. This lack of centralized regulation may restrict access for countries with limited institutional capacity, which could prevent them from fully participating in, or benefiting from, the carbon market.

On the other hand, Article 6.4’s centralized system offers stronger oversight and transparency, but at a cost. The strict parameters have slowed progress, with debates over methodology and credit eligibility causing delays. For example, COP28 exposed a lack of consensus on carbon removal standards, leaving project developers and investors uncertain about participation rules. Additionally, mandatory fees for supporting global climate funds can be a financial strain, particularly for developing nations that generate credits for wealthier countries that are seeking emissions offsets.

COP28 Progress and Unresolved Issues

COP28 in 2023 saw both progress and setbacks in advancing Article 6. On the Article 6.2 front, the first successful ITMO trade took place between Switzerland and Thailand, underscoring growing interest in bilateral agreements. However, the lack of finalized rules for reporting and authorization raised consistency concerns. On Article 6.4, disagreements over carbon removal methodologies hindered adoption, spotlighting the need for COP29 to finalize these guidelines to unlock Article 6.4’s full potential.

COP29: Critical Focus Areas

As COP29 began, early negotiations indicated breakthroughs, particularly on Article 6.4, with parties agreeing on how the mechanism will operate. This is a crucial step toward creating a functioning international carbon market accessible to countries and companies alike. However, some areas still require thorough discussion and clarity to ensure that these agreements lead to effective implementation. Here are the main issues expected to dominate COP29’s agenda:

1- Authorization and Revocation—A significant point of debate is whether host countries can revoke authorizations for carbon credits after transfer. This affects market stability, as buyers seek firm agreements while some host nations want flexibility to repurpose credits for schemes like the International Civil Aviation Organization’s CORSIA (Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation).

2- Emissions Avoidance Projects—There is ongoing debate over whether projects that prevent emissions, such as conservation efforts, should be eligible for carbon credits. Without strict definitions, the risk is an oversupply of low-quality credits, which would undermine market integrity.

3- Standardized Reporting—Consistent reporting formats are essential for transparency and accountability. COP29 aims to finalize ‘Agreed Electronic Format’ tables for Article 6 transactions to facilitate reliable data tracking.

4- UN-Managed International Registry—Intended to support countries without national registries, this registry has sparked debate over its role, security, and costs. Consensus on its function is vital for Article 6 accessibility across diverse countries.

The Article 6.4 Supervisory Body, tasked with creating this UN-governed carbon market, finalized foundational standards that cover carbon-removal project methodologies. Early adoption of these standards aims to improve transparency and operational efficiency, though some delegations have raised concerns that swift adoption procedures may bypass traditional governance methods. Environmental groups celebrated these steps cautiously as necessary to overcome procedural delays and move forward with Article 6.4’s implementation.

Striking a Balance: Equitable Carbon Markets

A fully realized Article 6 could significantly reduce the costs of emissions reductions by up to $250 billion by 2030, providing crucial financial support for developing nations’ climate goals. However, a balance is essential. Developing countries, as key suppliers of carbon credits, face the risk of ‘overselling’ credits, which could undermine their own NDCs. Meanwhile, wealthier nations must avoid excessive reliance on credits that shift emissions-reduction responsibilities onto less-resourced countries.

The Article 6.4 mechanism is intended to bridge climate finance gaps, offering new flows of support to nations with carbon-rich ecosystems. Yet, achieving these goals requires continuous refinement. The mechanism’s credibility relies on monitoring standards, reversal risk assessments, and a robust framework that respects indigenous rights, and ensures the long-term sustainability of carbon-credit projects.

Moving Forward with Article 6

COP29 must address these issues to build a reliable and transparent global carbon market. The potential for carbon markets to serve as powerful tools for climate action is real, but only if the system maintains high standards of integrity and accountability. This will require ambitious action, continuous oversight, and a commitment to equitable practices that avoids placing undue burdens on developing countries.

Article 6’s framework is a significant step, but the road ahead involves navigating competing interests, and ensuring that carbon markets serve their purpose without compromising environmental or social goals. With these steps, COP29 can make strides toward a sustainable, transparent, and effective global carbon market that is aligned with the Paris Agreement’s climate ambitions.

 

RELATED CONTENT

  • Authors
    Chami Abdelilah
    Derj Atar
    Hammi Ibtissem
    Morazzo Mariano
    Naciri Yassine
    with the technical support of AFRY
    July 9, 2021
    Les importantes ressources en énergies renouvelables du Maroc offrent une opportunité sans précédent d’ancrer les choix économiques et politiques du pays dans la transition énergétique, et de faire de cette transition un levier essentiel du développement économique. Ceci est d’autant plus important que le coût des énergies renouvelables a baissé au cours des 10 dernières années2 et présente désormais un fort potentiel, non seulement de création d’emplois verts mais aussi de croissan ...
  • Authors
    Chami Abdelilah
    Derj Atar
    Hammi Ibtissem
    Morazzo Mariano
    Naciri Yassine
    with the technical support of AFRY
    June 28, 2021
    Lors de la Conférence des Parties à la Convention-cadre des Nations unies sur les changements climatiques (CCNUCC) qui s'est tenue à Paris en 2015, les gouvernements se sont engagés à limiter l'augmentation de la température mondiale à un niveau bien inférieur à 2°C par rapport aux niveaux préindustriels. Ils se sont également engagés à atteindre, dès que possible, un pic de leurs émissions et à parvenir à la neutralité carbone au cours de la seconde moitié du siècle. Pour autant, m ...
  • Authors
    Chami Abdelilah
    Derj Atar
    Hammi Ibtissem
    Morazzo Mariano
    Naciri Yassine
    with the technical support of AFRY
    June 28, 2021
    During the 2015 Paris Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), governments pledged to limit the global temperature increase to well below 2°C above pre- industrial levels, to peak emissions as soon as possible, and to achieve carbon neutrality in the second half of the century. Yet, even assuming full implementation of the commitments made by governments in Paris, the global concentration of greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions will ...
  • Authors
    Bruno Souza
    June 18, 2021
    This paper estimates the economic impacts of climate change over the Brazilian regions until the end of the century. We estimate the direct and indirect impact of the projected changes in climate on the yield of the country’s main crops. The results point to a broad spatial heterogeneity of impacts across the country. Using the extreme scenarios created by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (RCP 2.6 and 8.5), our predictions indicate that the average annual losses ...
  • June 16, 2021
    It is now an established fact that investment in infrastructure is considered as a driver for economic growth. It acts through different channels. In the short run, the construction phase of any projects often implies the direct creation of new jobs and an indirect creation of on periph...
  • Authors
    May 31, 2021
    China is the world's largest exporter of goods. It is also, by any plausible criterion, a developing country. China's dual status needs to be better reflected in Chinese policies - recognizing its global responsibilities -- and in those of the Western powers - recognizing China's limitations. Across three important agendas - macroeconomics, development assistance, and climate - important differences between China and the West remain, yet none of these issues appears intractable. ...
  • April 28, 2021
    There are three major reasons for central banks to engage on climate change issues. The first is the set of – physical and transition - risks to financial stability potentially brought about by natural disasters and trends derived from climate change. Second, the potential impact of cli...
  • Authors
    Hanae Bezad
    Maximo Plo Seco
    Roger Hilton
    December 10, 2020
    The Atlantic basin faces considerable challenges on multiple fronts. Financial and economic struggles, coupled with political shifts and social turmoil, are reshaping the region’s geopolitical landscape. Unemployment, poverty, violence, migration, extremism, climate change and other problems are on the rise and the need to tackle them effectively is pressing. To find adequate solutions to these challenges, it is crucial to create inclusive discussions between the North and the Sout ...
  • Authors
    December 7, 2020
    The pandemic is accelerating history, in the sense that it is leading to the speeding up of some recent trends. In the case of globalization, the pandemic will not reverse it, but it will reshape it. Here we take a bird’s eye view of global trade during the pandemic, relate it to previous trends, and guess how global value chain managers and government trade policymakers are likely to react. A Bird’s Eye View of Global Trade during the Pandemic World trade took a deep dive during ...
  • Authors
    Patricio Aroca
    Pilar Jano
    Ademir Rocha
    Bruno Pimenta
    November 23, 2020
    Short-term climate conditions may affect crop yields and vintage quality and, as a consequence, wine prices and vineyards’ earnings. In this paper, we use a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model for Chile, which incorporates very detailed information about the value chain of the wine sector in the country. Using information for the 2015-2016 harvest, we calibrate climate variability shocks associated with a “bad year” for the wine industry in Chile, when premature rains occurre ...