Publications /
Opinion

Back
The Roles of Think Tanks in China-Morocco Cooperation
Authors
Jiemian Yang
March 18, 2016

In January 2016 the Chinese Government issued its first “China's Arab Policy Paper”, in which it stated: “We will enhance exchanges of experts and scholars from the two sides and actively explore the establishment of a long-term China-Arab exchange mechanism of think tanks.” I think that this line implies three things. First, it implies that the Chinese Government pays great attention to think tanks’ roles in China-Arab cooperation in the form of government document on the eve of President Xi Jinping’s first visit to the Middle East in his capacity of PRC’s President. Second, it implies that China looks forward to the Arab world would do the same and that China and Arab world should strengthen cooperation in think tank work in addition to our cooperation in other fields. Third, the Chinese Government is pragmatic enough to set low goals to start with by saying to “actively explore the establishment of a long-term China-Arab exchange mechanism of think tanks.”

Now, let us explore what these roles are and how we can elevate them to a new height. First of all, think tanks of both countries should do enough homework in enhancing mutual understanding. Frankly speaking, it is a long way even to go for this rudimentary role. The university courses, the public readings, the direct media communication and the interchanges between the two peoples are far from sufficient. For the think tanks, the traditional ways of publication exchanges and conferences should be enhanced by data banks, video conferences and digital networking.

Secondly, the think tanks should focus on the relevant thoughts, strategies and policies. They should build up the theories and principles of promoting China-Morocco cooperation and facilitate the environments for such cooperation. For instance, think tanks should be able to explain why a Communist-led country and a Muslim one share much values and goals. For another instance, think tanks should convince their respective governments and people alike that such cooperation will garner much greater achievements if they go their own ways. In terms of strategies and policies, the think tanks’ main job is to make recommendations based on solid academic work and rich practical experiences. We scholars are born to be critical. However, being think tank people, we need to make constructive recommendations rather than academic criticisms. Think tanks should make evaluations and recommendations not only to their respective governments but also each other. Their suggestions and recommendations should be practical and feasible.

Thirdly, both Chinese and Moroccan think tanks should establish more direct contacts and pursue for joint projects. Multilateral functions are important but the bilateral ones are more direct and effective in terms of cooperation. On this we need look for both talents and funds. In China Morocco Hands are in great shortage and funds are always not enough. Furthermore, our findings should find their ways to the decision makers and the public as well. This is to say that our academic work should be translated into actual policies and those policies should be understood and supported by the people. Presently joint assessments of regional situation and the possibility of Belt and Road Initiative should be the focus of our cooperation.

Fourthly, those think tanks should work more at establishing China-Arab/Morocco exchange mechanism. Think tanks are non-government actors. Therefore, they think and behave differently vis-à-vis the government actors. The think tanks have more flexibility in dealing with the third parties. The China Institute for International Studies is doing some of the pioneering job. We are looking forward to their great achievements and more glaring achievements.

Last but not least, the think tanks network between China and the Arab World should be able to remove the misunderstanding and design our common future. Moreover, some small steps can make up gigantic strides. The main think tanks of our two countries should come together first. Then this bilateral cooperation should and could develop into multilateral ones. We are new to these but we can learn from the existent networks such as the Council of Councils and the ASEAN Institutes of Strategic and International Studies.

To conclude, think tanks should proceed ahead of others so as to provide forward-looking opinions, suggestions and the end of the conflicts and wars. Both China and Morocco should produce more rewarding outcomes and set good examples to the others. It is my sincere hope that this Roundtable be served as a new round of inter-think tank cooperation between us, with all of our Moroccan counterparts.

RELATED CONTENT

  • March 17, 2016
    Jointly organized by OCP Policy Center and Shanghai Institutes for International Studies, the roundtable on "Current African Economic and Strategic Challenges and Opportunities; Intersecting Views from China and Morocco" was a great opportunity to gather experts from both side, to brainstorm opportunities to enhance the role of think-tanks and civil society organization in the consolidation of the Afro-Asian cooperation more efficiently and in a more comprehensive way. The seminar ...
  • March 14, 2016
    During the Lisbon Summit back in 2010, NATO adopted its third post-bipolar Strategic Concept acknowledging the structural and functional transformation process. In addition to its traditional mission of ensuring mutual defense, stabilizing its surroundings and global power projection capability now adds to the organization’s mission. As a matter of fact, the role of NATO could be shifting from a regional defense alliance to that of a global player. However, one can only wonder wheth ...
  • Authors
    Lea Metke
    March 13, 2015
    Le 2 décembre 2014, l’Institut français des relations internationales (Ifri) et l’OCP Policy Center ont organisé un séminaire intitulé « Des émergents au défi du retour de la géopolitique : regards croisés économiques et géopolitiques » à Rabat. Intervenants et experts se sont réunis pour discuter du rapport entre émergence et puissance à travers plusieurs études de cas: Chine, Russie, Turquie et Maroc. Chine : une puissance qui peine à s'assumer Après la crise de 2008, le positio ...
  • Authors
    Alice Ekman
    February 1, 2013
    Ces deux dernières années ont été marquées par les mouvements de protestation dans le monde arabe. Ces mouvements ont été suivis avec la plus grande attention par les autorités chinoises, préoccupées à la fois par les conséquences intérieures, sur l’opinion publique et la stabilité politique du pays, et extérieures, sur les intérêts économiques et les ressortissants chinois présents en Afrique du Nord. Mais ces mouvements ont-ils changé la perception et les orientations stratégiques ...
  • Authors
    Emiliano Alessandri
    William Inboden
    Dhruva Jaishankar
    Joseph Quinlan
    Andrew Small
    Amy Studdart
    December 1, 2012
    This policy paper examines the role of China and India in Latin America and Africa, and the implications for the United States and Europe. China and India have arrived as active players in the Southern Atlantic space. Their economic presence is expanding rapidly, with a focus on their acquisition of — and access to — raw materials such as fossil fuels, minerals, and agricultural commodities. The political and security implications of their arrival in the region is only now coming u ...
  • Authors
    Françoise Nicolas
    January 1, 2011
    La montée en puissance de la Chine et de l’Inde domine les débats économiques depuis quelques années déjà. Poursuivant une stratégie d’internationalisation résolue, les entreprises chinoises et indiennes sont désormais présentes dans bon nombre de régions du globe. Ce dynamisme n’a pas manqué de susciter des inquiétudes mais aussi des espoirs, notamment dans le monde en développement, où ces deux pays sont perçus comme des partenaires potentiellement plus bienveillants que les pays ...