Publications /
Opinion

Back
U.S. Foreign Policy: No Predictability or Logic?
Authors
January 7, 2020

It must have flattered Donald Trump to be honored by a dictator, whom he publicly confessed to love and hold in high esteem. North Koreas Kim Yong-un had ordered that a stamp would be issued commemorating the meeting of the two leaders at Panmunjon, at the demilitarized zone between the north and south. The US President made history when he walked in June of this year a few steps onto North Korean territory, the first American President ever to enter the communist state, ready to make a deal-the total and verifiable denuclearization of the Peninsula.

Another great photo opportunity-the American leader at the front line. The stamp as a document of history. But also of failure. No peace in sight. Not now. Not then, or in Singapore in 2018. Eighteen months and a few short range missile tests ago. Donald Trump, who characterized himself as “very stable genius”, with “great” negotiation skills, has yet to convince the North Korean leader to return to the negotiation table—for a fourth time. Of all people, Joe Biden, the former US Vice President and for now Trump’s most serious rival of the Democratic Party for the Presidency, offered Trump the opportunity to relaunch their privileged communication: The North apparently felt aggrieved over a campaign ad by Biden’s campaign condemning Trump’s foreign policy. The ad said that “dictators and tyrants are praised, our allies pushed aside”, and featured an image of Trump meeting Kim for a first time in Singapore.

“YOU SHOULD ACT QUICKLY”

Pyongyang fumed that Biden had the “temerity to dare slander the dignity of the supreme leadership---Rabid doges like Biden can hurt lots of people if they are allowed to run around”, the official news agency KCNA complained, “they must be beaten to death with a stick.” The American President, officially beyond 11000 tweets, reacted with a timid tweet defence of his rival and reminded the communist leader:” Mr. Chairman, Joe Biden may be Sleepy and Very Slow, but he is not a “rabid dog”. He is actually somewhat better than that, but I am the only one who can get you where you have to be. You should act quickly, get the deal done. See you soon.”

Wishful thinking, perhaps, this idea of another rendezvous, possibly another theatrical photo op close to election time. Kim Yong-un has notified Washington months ago that for him this year’s end is deadline, the end of self-constrained. Since 2017 Pyongyang has not test fired any Intercontinental, nuclear capable, ballistic missiles or conducted nuclear tests. Without doubt the regime used the time to extend its arsenal. More bombs, more missiles, more arguments for the dictator. He did not react personally to Trump, a former North Korean vice foreign minister did:” We will not give anything for the US president to brag about as we have received nothing in return, and we want to receive the benefits of the accomplishments that President Trump is crediting himself for. «Washington seems without strategy except insisting on total nuclear disarmament. This fall working level talks between the two sides in Sweden ended with the North Korean envoy accusing the Americans of coming to the table without any new offers; possibly to appease Pyongyang Washington recently postponed US- South Korean air force drills, which would have involved an undisclosed number of US and South Korean aircraft.

It is only logic and understandable that Donald Trump is not focusing on North Korea since at home he is threatened by impeachment procedures initiated by “one of the United States biggest foreign policy controversies in nearly two decades (“New York Times”, 22.11), since the debate over the intelligence that led to the war in Iraq. Did the President organize a shadow group, including his personal lawyer Rudolph Giuliani, to search in Ukraine for traces of corruption involving his rival Joe Biden and son? Was his later leaked phone call with the newly elected President Volodymyr Zelensky as innocent as the President claims, or did he pressure his colleague in Kiev to declare publicly that the authorities of the country were investigating possible corruption deals of his leading rival for the US Presidency? The price-- an invitation to the White House and the resumption of the delivery of military aid, worth 391 million US dollars, linked to this “small favor”, helping Trump in a smear campaign? For the US President the accusations are either a “witch hunt” or “a hoax”, or is his method possibly just how the former real estate tycoon understands foreign policy?

NO PREDICTABILITY OR LOGIC

Tough economic measures against Beijing, sanctions on Iran, Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, exemptions for Turkey or Saudi Arabia, tolerance towards Russia, irritations about the Taliban, invited to Washington and then ordered to stay home, the destructions of treaties, as the Iran anti-nuclear deal, ignorance of and disinterest in global danger of climate change, a strategy, if it can be understood like this, with no predictability or logic. After oil installations were blown up in Saudi Arabia Trump declared that the United States was “locked and loaded”, a phrase that seemed to suggest Washington was ready to strike back, presumably against the accused aggressor, Iran. But then Donald Trump promised to wait for Saudi Arabia to tell him “under what terms we would proceed.” The message of the Commander in Chief on Twitter “offered a remarkable insight into the deference Mr Trump gives to the Saudi royal family” stated the” New York Times”, and “touched off a torrent of criticism from those who have long accused him of doing Ryadh’s bidding while sweeping Saudi violations of human rights and international norms under the rug. If the President wants to use military force,” he needs congress, not the Saudi royal family to authorize it”, Representative David Cicilline, the Chairman of the Democratic Policy and Communications Committee wrote on Twitter.

With one phone call Donald Trump opened the gate for brutal forces of Turkey to invade Syria, hunting for Kurds, their enemies, who were allies of the USA until Donald Trump decided otherwise—11000 kurds who trusted Washington died in the battles against ISIS. The retreat of a thousand US Special Forces soldiers was so abrupt that the US had to bomb a depot full of arms that it did not have time to remove. Trump’s ignorance of the world “has never been so blatant”, observed Robin Wright in the “New Yorker”, and “produced such bipartisan opposition”. The House of Representatives voted 354-60 to condemn the Trump ordered pullout. On the Senate floor, Mitt Romney, Republican of Utah, rebuked the President for leaving a “bloodstain on the annals of American history.” As a candidate Trump gloried in beating up on foreign policy experts, wrote Daniel Drezner, professor of International Politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, asserting that he “could get better results relying on his gut.” In facilitating the Turkish invasion the US President did follow his gut—and “rarely has a presidential decision resulted so immediately in what his own party leaders have described as disastrous consequences for American allies and interests “.

“LET THEM FIGHT LIKE TWO KIDS”

Yet Trump seemed delighted with his decision, to let the turks and the kurds, both US allies, fight it out, wrote Robin Wright.” It was unconventional, what I did” he told the crowd at a campaign rally in Dallas. «Sometimes you have to let them fight like two kids. Then you pull them apart.” A few weeks after Trump published a letter he had send (on October 9) to Erdogan after the turks had invaded Syria with Trumps blessings:” Don’t be a tough guy. Don’t be a fool. I will call you later”, and after having threatened to” totally destroy and obliterate” Turkey’s economy, Recep Tayyip Erdogan was received in the White House. Donald Trump praised him “as a tough guy, who deserves respect”. The tough words were for public consumption, business as usual continues in private. Trump’s son of law, Jared Kushner, keeps the communication open with the Turks, since he is a friend of Erdogan’s son in law, Berat Albayrak, the finance minister. Both are connected with the son of law of a Turkish tycoon, who is a business partner of the Trump organization and owner of the “Trump Towers” in Istanbul. The trio of son in laws is keeping the communication channels open, regardless of policy problems. Critics say the Trump administration has balked at aggressively punishing a state owned Turkish bank for evading American sanctions against Iran. Mr Trump has also deferred legally mandated sanctions against Turkey, a member of NATO, for installing Russian missile defense systems. No surprise, admitted Trump at the press conference with his guest:” I am great fan of the president. I have to tell you that.”Mr Erdogan , wrote the “New York Times” in a lead article (“Mr Trump courts another tyrant”) was getting away without any quid pro quo, and that is the problem.”A White House meeting with an authoritarian thug like Mr Erdogan should have a clear and tangible foreign policy benefit for the United States and the world. By contrast, a White House invitation to an ally, like Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky should be a demonstration of generous support. The difference seems to escape Mr Trump.”

“IMPOVISATIONAL FLIRTATIONS”

Trump’s disdain for professional diplomacy and its practitioners, stated William Burns, US Deputy Secretary of State ( 2011 to 2014) and presently President of the “Carnegie Endowment for International Peace”, “along with his penchant for improvisational flirtations with authoritarian leaders …has put an unaccustomed spotlight on our profession.”Dozens of US Embassies worldwide are without an ambassador, hundreds, if not thousands, Foreign service professionals of the State Department have resigned because of lack of leadership. Mike Pompeo, the Secretary of State and close ally of Trump, who is rumored to leave his post early next year to prepare a political campaign for a Senate seat in his home state Kansas, has not defended any of his diplomats testifying in the impeachment procedures against the President, who is not really interested in their professional advise because Trump swears on his famous gut feeling. Didn’t the President declare, years ago, the nuclear threat of North Korea had turned into history? He was certain that tough sanctions would force the ruler of Venezuela to capitulate and Tehran would beg Washington for negotiations on the cancelled nuclear deal. Iran suffers, violent demonstrations and deaths are reported, but, so far there is no white flag of capitulation visible. According to a report just released by the Department of Defense Inspector General President Trump’s withdrawal from Syria has allowed ISIS” to reconstitute capabilities and resources within Syria and strengthen its ability to plan attacks abroad.”

As President, judges Daniel Drezner, Trump has governed “mostly by tantrums. He has bullied and insulted allies. He has said that he trusts Russian President Vladimir Putin more than his own intelligence briefers. The repated attacks on EU and Nato”, writes Drezner, “represent a bigger strategic mistake than the invasion of Iraq.” Trump “is a win –lose negotiator, said Wendy R.Sherman, a former undersecretary of state under Mr Obama, who helped broker the 2015 nuclear agreement with Iran that Trump abandoned last year.”That’s what he did as a real estate developer. He does not see the larger landscape, the interconnections, the larger costs, the loss of greater benefits.” Trump has sealed an accord to update the North American Free Trade Agreement with Mexico and Canada, revised a trade agreement with South Korea and reached a limited trade pact with Japan. He made no progress in the long, drawn out Israeli- Palestinian peace initiative, with the exception to declare Jerusalem the capital of Israel, the occupied Syrian Golan Heights as territory of the Jewish nation and its illegal occupation of Palestinian land, legal.

Just when Donald Trump is experiencing the unpleasant part of love, the sobering of his relationship with Kim Yong-un, the President has challenged America’s partners in South Korea with an outlandish demand. The nation, loyal to Trump in its dealings with the enemy in the north, South Korea (paying almost half of the cost for the stationing of 28 000 US troops in the South), has been asked by Trump to pay an outlandish quintuple of the current payments. No surprise-the negotiations broke down and not only the Koreans in the north (for other reasons) but those in the south are up in arms and Mr Trump’s unreasonable compensation demand” undermines yet another alliance” (New York Times”) Worse: “Mr Trumps mercantile approach to stationing American troops abroad is highly detrimental to America’s role in the world, and its own security and prosperity. In effect, he reduces the Americans abroad to a for-profit-mercenary force…”

The opinions expressed in this article belong to the author.

RELATED CONTENT

  • Authors
    Alexis Arieff
    July 1, 2011
    This paper explores the recent evolution of security cooperation between the United States and Algeria, which have forged a strong partnership on counterterrorism despite lingering mutual distrust. The United States has strengthened its defense outreach to Algeria over the past decade, largely based on concerns over transnational terrorism, and Algeria has sought to benefit from this outreach as it positions itself as a vital player on regional issues following years of civil confli ...
  • Authors
    Abderrahmane Mebtoul
    April 1, 2011
    Pièce maîtresse dans la région euroméditerranéenne, le Maghreb est sollicité par l'Union européenne, et plus récemment par les Etats-Unis, dans le cadre d'une compétition entre ces deux pôles dans leur recherche d'une hégémonie économique. Plusieurs années après que l'Accord d'Association avec l'Europe est entré en vigueur, a-t-il permis une coopération économique, financière et sociale orientée vers une véritable accumulation du savoir-faire organisationnel et technologique ? Quell ...
  • Authors
    François Gemenne
    March 1, 2011
    This paper analyzes the future of migrations related to climate changes and environment degradations. He shows how the dominant public reasoning remains inappropriate for addressing these issues, because of the Western/Northern countries' misconception of the relation between migration and environmental changes, including the cultural and political biases these countries show in the solutions they propose. The discrepancy between public policies and the actual reality of climatic an ...
  • Authors
    Françoise Nicolas
    January 1, 2011
    La montée en puissance de la Chine et de l’Inde domine les débats économiques depuis quelques années déjà. Poursuivant une stratégie d’internationalisation résolue, les entreprises chinoises et indiennes sont désormais présentes dans bon nombre de régions du globe. Ce dynamisme n’a pas manqué de susciter des inquiétudes mais aussi des espoirs, notamment dans le monde en développement, où ces deux pays sont perçus comme des partenaires potentiellement plus bienveillants que les pays ...
  • October 20, 2010
    Under the general title of “The Mediterranean in a multipolar world up to 2030”, CIDOB, in partnership with the OCP Foundation in Rabat, is working on a three year research program (2010-2012) whose aim is to analyse how countries in the area might overcome their differences and imagine a common future. This publication is a result of the initial phase of the research, which focused on energy and regional integration in the Western Mediterranean. It includes 5 comprehensive papers w ...
  • Authors
    Radhi Meddeb
    September 17, 2010
    The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) is a regional organization which was created in 1981, reassembling six Arab countries together: Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Oman, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Thanks to their oil income, GCC countries have enjoyed economic boom since 2002, hence breaking with the 1990s economic slow-down. The year 2002 corresponds to the oil prices’ entry in an upward spiral which has resulted in an increase of both income and foreign assets. This ...
  • Authors
    Kassim Bouhou
    September 17, 2010
    Before the 9/11 events, US-Maghreb relations were growing stronger, especially after the United States had long left the floor to the Maghreb’s “natural” European partner. Therefore the American action in this region was in line with a mechanism previously set off by Clinton Administration member, Stuart Eizenstat, which aimed at reducing intra regional obstacles and stimulating American investments towards an area where Americans were little-represented. Hence Washington seemed mor ...
  • Authors
    Flore Gubert
    September 1, 2010
    The potential synergy between development and migration has become a key feature of most international migration politics. However, this relationship is far from evident. Flore Gubert helps better understand the complexity of this relationship through the comparison of two regional contexts (Mexico and North Africa), and shows how the political and economic context prevailing in the countries of origin modifies the link between migration and development. This Note de l'Ifri is the ...