Publications /
Policy Brief

Back
An Incentivizing System of Ownership and of Usufruct Rights
Authors
October 3, 2018

Sustained productivity growth, stretched over decades in which the majority of farmers participate in and benefit from, successfully transform agriculture. Such sustained growth requires broad-based public and private investments. Why would private households invest in farming year in, year out, unless they expect to gain monetarily and can easily raise the credit needed? Security of tenure is critical for farmers to invest for growth and profit. This is shown to be true where security of tenure holds and where it does not. While this insight is generally not controversial, what is often controversial is how to achieve it.

The case of China’s agricultural and overall economic transformation, starting around 1979, is a dramatic example of the pivotal importance of private incentives anchored in tenure security and private profit. The Household Responsibility System (HRS) was a revolutionary measure in a China, which had implemented collectivized agriculture in accordance to Chairman Mao’s conviction that it was, in fact, superior. In this system, farmers could not see the direct link between their effort and their remuneration. However, after some 30 years (1949-79) of determined collectivization, agricultural performance was still lack luster and poverty extensive.

This brief illustrates the power of land tenure security for sustained agricultural productivity and income growth; and the difficulties for political leadership to ensure such security.

RELATED CONTENT

  • January 17, 2024
    When this interview was recorded, Argentina had just sworn in a new president of the Nation, raising many questions about the political future of the South American country. The freshly installed Head of State had led a peculiar campaign, had promised to slash government spending, in a ...
  • January 12, 2024
    In this podcast, Ms. Nathalie Delapalme, Executive Director of the Mo Ibrahim Foundation, presents a compelling philosophical approach to understanding the new Africa. Ms. Delapalme empha ...
  • Authors
    Elhoussaine Wahyana
    January 12, 2024
    The debate on global value chains (GVCs) has emphasized countries’ contributions to value-added creation. From an intercountry perspective, a new body of research is addingto this debate by studying how subnational regions contribute to the indicators in specific countries. Proper assessment of economic contributions is essential for designing incentive policies. This paper analyzes the role played by the main trading partners of Moroccan regions in local value chains. We use input- ...
  • Authors
    January 12, 2024
    A 2023 United Nations progress report (UN, 2023) showed that, of the 169 targets that make up the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), only 15% are on track, and progress on many has either stalled or regressed. The Water-Energy-Food nexus approach has highlighted the utmost importance of understanding the interconnections between systems in order to accelerate the achievement of the SDGs. In this policy brief, we use the lessons learned from the water sector through a case study f ...
  • January 11, 2024
    Dans cet épisode, nous abordons la sécurité sanitaire en Afrique, un continent aux réalités socio-économiques variées. Malgré des défis majeurs tels que la mortalité infantile et les maladies infectieuses, les systèmes de santé sont sous-financés. Nous mettons en lumière les acteurs clé...
  • January 9, 2024
    نعود إلى أبرز حلقات الموسم الفارط من برنامجنا الأسبوعي حديث الثلاثاء، حيث دارت أغلب نقاشاتنا حول الجنوب الجديد وقضايا المحيط الأطلسي الموسع، بالتركيز على  التعاون كآلية منسِّقة لتحديات مثل التغير المناخي والمساهمة في السلام والأمن في المنطقة. إذ أنه بالنظر إلى ديناميكيات التكامل الإقليم...
  • January 08, 2024
    The role played by diasporas in international relations should not be neglected. Bilateral engagements between states can be significantly affected by the practical and perspective relati ...
  • Authors
    January 5, 2024
    La guerre n’est, par sa nature, pas arithmétique. En matière de stratégie militaire, ni l’addition est toujours un ajout ni la soustraction une diminution. La multiplication n’amplifie pas comme la division ne réduit pas. Les moyens sont certes un avantage dans la guerre, mais l’issue des conflits (victoire ou défaite) n’en dépendent pas exclusivement. La guerre révèle la résilience d’une société et pas seulement la puissance d’une armée. Mieux, elle montre la dépendance de la puiss ...